Re: New XFS benchmarks using David Chinner's recommendations for XFS-based optimizations.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Changliang Chen <hqucocl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: New XFS benchmarks using David Chinner's recommendations for XFS-based optimizations.
From: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 04:07:48 -0500 (EST)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Alan Piszcz <ap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <aea685120801032135l810ef7dy4079ebb2704dfe94@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



On Fri, 4 Jan 2008, Changliang Chen wrote:

Hi Justin£¬

    From your report£¬It looks that the p34-default's behavior is
better£¬which item make you consider that the p34-dchinner looks nice£¿

--
Best Regards

The re-write and sequential input and output is faster for dchinner.

Justin.

References:
- New XFS benchmarks using David Chinner's recommendations for XFS-based optimizations.
  - From: Justin Piszcz

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] md: Fix data corruption when a degraded raid5 array is reshaped.
Next by Date: Re: On the subject of RAID-6 corruption recovery
Previous by thread: Re: New XFS benchmarks using David Chinner's recommendations for XFS-based optimizations.
Next by thread: Last ditch plea on remote double raid5 disk failure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux