>>> Cody Yellan wrote:
>>>> I had a 4x500GB SATA2 array, md0. I added one 500GB drive and
>>>> reshaping began at ~2500K/sec. Changing
>>>> /proc/sys/dev/raid/speed_limit_m{in,ax} or
>>>> /sys/block/md0/md/sync_speed_m{in,ax} had no effect. I shut down
>all
>>>> unnecessary services and the array is offline (not mounted). I
>have
>>>> read that the throttling code is "fragile" (esp. with regard to
>>>> raid5) but does this make sense? I will wait (in)patiently for
>it to
>>>> finish, but I do wonder why the configuration parameters have no
>>>> effect. This is a dual quad 2GHz Xeon machine with 8GB of memory
>>>> running RHEL5. Is this the maximum speed?
>>
>>Are you running a non-standard /sys/block/md5/md/stripe_cache_size?
>>
>>I found when running a kernel of about that vintage on FC6 (which I
>>guess became RHEL5), that with a stripe_cache_size of 16384, resyncs
>
>>dropped down to about the speed you are seeing.
>>
>>This changed back to more normal speeds with a later kernel, but I
>do
>>not recall which.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Richard
You are right, Richard. RHEL5 had a stripe_cache_size of 256 when
the reshape began. I increased it to 1024 and the reshape speed
doubled to 4500K/s. I did not see any increase in memory usage. I
tried 2048 and then 4096 but saw no difference in speed.
The reshape finished and the array is back online. mdadm works very
well, but I would like to better understand how it works. For
instance, the mdadm man page says a backup-file is necessary to grow
a RAID5, but this does not appear necessary now. Anyway, it's a
wonderful tool.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
