----- Message from janek_listy@xxxxx ---------
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2007 14:16:45 +0100
From: Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@xxxxx>
Reply-To: Janek Kozicki <janek_listy@xxxxx>
Subject: Re: raid5 reshape/resync
To: Nagilum <nagilum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Nagilum said: (by the date of Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:56:13 +0100)Ok, I've recreated the problem in form of a semiautomatic testcase. All necessary files (plus the old xfs_repair output) are at: http://www.nagilum.de/md/After running the test.sh the created xfs filesystem on the raid device is broken and (at last in my case) cannot be mounted anymore.I think that you should file a bugreport, and provide there the explanations you have put in there. An automated test case that leads to xfs corruption is a neat snack for bug squashers ;-) I wonder however where to report this - the xfs or raid ? Eventually cross report to both places and write in the bugreport that you are not sure on which side there is a bug.
----- End message from janek_listy@xxxxx -----This is a md/mdadm problem. xfs is merely used as a vehicle to show the problem also amplified bei luks.
Where would I file this bug report? I thought this is the place? I could also really use a way to fix that corruption. :( Thanks, Alex. PS: yesterday I verified this bug on 2.6.23.9, will do 2.6.23.11 today. ======================================================================== # _ __ _ __ http://www.nagilum.org/ \n icq://69646724 # # / |/ /__ ____ _(_) /_ ____ _ nagilum@xxxxxxxxxxx \n +491776461165 # # / / _ `/ _ `/ / / // / ' \ Amiga (68k/PPC): AOS/NetBSD/Linux # # /_/|_/\_,_/\_, /_/_/\_,_/_/_/_/ Mac (PPC): MacOS-X / NetBSD /Linux # # /___/ x86: FreeBSD/Linux/Solaris/Win2k ARM9: EPOC EV6 # ======================================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------- cakebox.homeunix.net - all the machine one needs..
Attachment:
pgpm1TvOQScLk.pgp
Description: PGP Digital Signature
