On Wednesday December 12, jeff@xxxxxxx wrote: > > >If you can be certain that the device that you break out of the mirror > >is never altered, then you could add an internal bitmap while the > >array is split and the rebuild will go much faster. > > Is this also a viable speedup for the "kep rotating backup drives through > the array" strategy? If so, how much speedup are we talking about? Assume > the array changes by 1% before a backup drive gets rotated in again. > Not really... The bitmap only records areas of the array that have changed since one particular moment in time. For rotating backs you would really want several moments in time. Whenever the array is non-degraded, the bitmap forgets any old state. What you could do is set the number of devices in the array to 3 so they it always appears to be degraded, then rotate your backup drives through the array. The number of dirty bits in the bitmap will steadily grow and so resyncs will take longer. Once it crosses some threshold you set the array back to having 2 devices to that it looks non-degraded and clean the bitmap. Then each device will need a full resync after which you will get away with partial resyncs for a while. Not ideal, but it might work. If 1% changes each time, then you will initially get a 100 fold speedup, dropping away after that. NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
