Re: /proc/mdstat docs (was Re: Few questions)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Greaves wrote:
Michael Makuch wrote:
So my questions are:
...
- Is this a.o.k for a raid5 array?

So I realised that /proc/mdstat isn't documented too well anywhere...

http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Mdstat

Comments welcome...

David

One thing, in the section "md device line" you describe how to identify spare devices, but you didn't mention the "(S)" which appears after a spare device, at least it does on mine:

# uname -a
Linux pecan.makuch.org 2.6.23.1-21.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Nov 1 21:09:24 EDT 2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

# cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid6] [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 etherd/e0.0[0] etherd/e0.2[9](S) etherd/e0.9[8] etherd/e0.8[7] etherd/e0.7[6] etherd/e0.6[5] etherd/e0.5[4] etherd/e0.4[3] etherd/e0.3[2] etherd/e0.1[1]
     3907091968 blocks level 5, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [9/9] [UUUUUUUUU]
[==================>..] resync = 91.0% (444527040/488386496) finish=560.9min speed=1301K/sec
unused devices: <none>


Unless that means something else??? But e0.2 is my spare so I'm just assuming "(S)" means spare!

Thanks
Mike


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux