Re: mounting raid5 with different unit values

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well... this thing actually works just fine with a newer kernel (
2.6.18-8-el5 centos5 ). I managed to mount / mkfs.xfs over raid5 with
a pseudo raid5 unit size, and with the appropriate raid 5 patches and
user space access-pattern, I elimintaed in 99% cases the read penalty
.
I sincerly hope I won't be getting any crashes with this file system tunnings.
so ... first, chris and all you xfs guys, many many thanks.
Chris,  How "dangerous" these tunnings are ? Am I to expect "weird"
behaviour of the file system ?

On 10/8/07, Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:48:14AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
>
> > man mount :)
>
> Ah of course.
>
> But those will be more restrictive that what you can specify when you
> make the file-system (because mkfs.xfs can aligned the AGs to suit).
>


-- 
Raz
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux