Bill Davidsen said: (by the date of Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:01:05 -0400)
> So I would expect this to make a very large performance difference, so
> even if it work it would do so slowly.
I was trying to find out the stripe layout for few hours, using
hexedit and dd. And I'm baffled:
md1 : active raid5 hda3[0] sda3[1]
969907968 blocks super 1.1 level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [3/2] [UU_]
bitmap: 8/8 pages [32KB], 32768KB chunk
I fill md1 with random data:
# dd bs=128k count=64 if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/md1
# hexedit /dev/md1
I copy/paste (and remove formmatting) the first 32 bytes of /dev/md1,
now I search for those 32 bytes in /dev/hda3 and in /dev/sda3:
# hexedit /dev/hda3
# hexedit /dev/sda3
And no luck! I'd expect the first bytes of /dev/md1 to be on
beginning of the first drive (hda3).
I pick next 20 bytes from /dev/md1 and I can find them on /dev/hda3
starting just after address 0x10000. The bytes before and after those
20 bytes are similar to those on /dev/md1. So now I hexedit /dev/md1
and write by hand 32 bytes of 0xAA. Then I look at address 0x10000
on /dev/hda3 - and there is no 0xAA at all.
Well.. it's not critical for me, so you can just ignore my mumbling,
I was just wondering what obvious did I miss. There seems to be more
XORing (or sth. else) involved than I expected.
Maybe the disc did not flush writes, and what I see on /dev/md1 is
not yet present on /dev/hda3 (how's that possible?)
Nevertheless, I think that I will resign from LVM, and just put ext3
on /dev/md1, to avoid this stripe misalignment. I wanted LVM here
only because I might wanted to use lvm-snapshot, but I can live
without that. I can already grow /dev/md1 without LVM, but using
mdadm grow.
best regards
--
Janek Kozicki |
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
