Re: Time to deprecate old RAID formats?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Doug Ledford wrote:

I would argue that ext[234] should be clearing those 512 bytes.  Why
aren't they cleared

Actually, I didn't think msdos used the first 512 bytes for the same
reason ext3 doesn't: space for a boot sector.


The creators of MS-DOS put the superblock in the bootsector, so that the BIOS loads them both. It made sense in some diseased Microsoft programmer's mind.

Either way, for RAID-1 booting, the boot sector really should be part of the protected area (and go through the MD stack.) The bootloader should deal with the offset problem by storing partition/filesystem-relative pointers, not absolute ones.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux