Re: Implementing low level timeouts within MD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:08:07AM -0500, Alberto Alonso wrote:

> > > * Internal serverworks PATA controller on a netengine server. The
> > >   server if off waiting to get picked up, so I can't get the important
> > >   details.
> > 
> > 1 PATA failure.
> 
> I was surprised on this one, I did have good luck with with PATA in
> the past. The kernel is whatever came standard in Fedora Core 2

The keyword here is probably not "PATA" but "Serverworks"... AFAIR that
chipset was always considered somewhat problematic. You may want to try
with the libata driver, it has a nice comment:

 *      Note that we don't copy the old serverworks code because the old
 *      code contains obvious mistakes

But even the new driver retained this coment from the old driver:

 * Documentation:
 *      Available under NDA only. Errata info very hard to get.

It isn't exactly giving me warm feelings to trust data to this chipset...

Gabor

-- 
     ---------------------------------------------------------
     MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
                Hungarian Academy of Sciences
     ---------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux