On Friday October 26, davidsen@xxxxxxx wrote: > > Perhaps you could have called them 1.start, 1.end, and 1.4k in the > beginning? Isn't hindsight wonderful? > Those names seem good to me. I wonder if it is safe to generate them in "-Eb" output.... Maybe the key confusion here is between "version" numbers and "revision" numbers. When you have multiple versions, there is no implicit assumption that one is better than another. "Here is my version of what happened, now let's hear yours". When you have multiple revisions, you do assume ongoing improvement. v1.0 v1.1 and v1.2 are different version of the v1 superblock, which itself is a revision of the v0... NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
