On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 10:00 +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:52:59PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> >On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 11:54 +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
> >> On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 09:11:57AM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
> >> just apply some rules, so if you find a partition table _AND_ an md
> >> superblock at the end, read both and you can tell if it is an md on a
> >> partition or a partitioned md raid1 device.
> >
> >In fact, no you can't. I know, because I've created a device that had
> >both but wasn't a raid device. And it's matching partner still existed
> >too. What you are talking about would have misrecognized this
> >situation, guaranteed.
> then just ignore the device and log a warning, instead of doing a random
> choice.
> L.
It also happened to be my OS drive pair. Ignoring it would have
rendered the machine unusable.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
Infiniband specific RPMs available at
http://people.redhat.com/dledford/Infiniband
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
