Re: Time to deprecate old RAID formats?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Neil Brown wrote:
>> I certainly accept that the documentation is probably less that
>> perfect (by a large margin).  I am more than happy to accept patches
>> or concrete suggestions on how to improve that.  I always think it is
>> best if a non-developer writes documentation (and a developer reviews
>> it) as then it is more likely to address the issues that a
>> non-developer will want to read about, and in a way that will make
>> sense to a non-developer. (i.e. I'm to close to the subject to write
>> good doco).
> 
> Patches against what's in 2.6.4 I assume? I can't promise to write
> anything which pleases even me, but I will take a look at it.
> 

The man page is a great place for describing, eg, the superblock location; but
don't forget we have
  http://linux-raid.osdl.org/index.php/Main_Page
which is probably a better place for *discussions* (or essays) about the
superblock location (eg the LVM / v1.1 comment Janek picked up on)

In fact I was going to take some of the writings from this thread and put them
up there.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux