Justin Piszcz wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Marko Berg wrote:
Corey Hickey wrote:
Marko Berg wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
Marko Berg wrote:
Any suggestions on how to fix this, or what to investigate next, would
be appreciated!
I'm not sure what you're trying to "fix" here, everything you posted
looks sane.
I'm trying to find the missing 300 GB that, as df reports, are not
available. I ought to have a 900 GB array, consisting of four 300 GB
devices, while only 600 GB are available. Adding the fourth device didn't
increase the capacity of the array (visible, at least). E.g. fdisk reports
the array size to be 900 G, but df still claims 600 capacity. Any clues
why?
df reports the size of the filesystem, which is still about 600GB--the
filesystem doesn't resize automatically when the size of the underlying
device changes.
You'll need to use resize2fs, resize_reiserfs, or whatever other tool is
appropriate for your type of filesystem.
-Corey
Right, so this isn't one of my sharpest days... Thanks a bunch, Corey!
No problem.
Ah, already answered.
vger.kernel.org greylisted my smtp server, so it took my message a while
to get to the list.
-Corey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
