Re: RAID 5 performance issue.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Andrew Clayton wrote:

On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:46:05 -0400, Steve Cousins wrote:

Andrew Clayton wrote:
On Thu, 4 Oct 2007 10:39:09 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote:


 >> What type (make/model) of the drives?
   >
The drives are 250GB  Hitachi Deskstar 7K250 series ATA-6 UDMA/100
  A couple of things:

    1. I thought you had SATA drives
    2. ATA-6 would be UDMA/133

The SATA-1 versions of the 7K250's did not have NCQ. The SATA-2
versions do have NCQ. If you do have SATA drives, are they SATA-1 or
SATA-2?

Not sure, I suspect SATA 1 seeing as we've had them nearly 3 years.

Some bits from dmesg

ata1: SATA max UDMA/100 cmd 0xffffc20000aa4880 ctl 0xffffc20000aa488a
bmdma 0xff ffc20000aa4800 irq 19
ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
ata1.00: ATA-6: HDS722525VLSA80, V36OA63A, max UDMA/100
ata1.00: 488397168 sectors, multi 16: LBA48
ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100

Steve

Andrew
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


Looks like SATA1 (non-ncq) to me.

Justin.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux