Re: RAID 5 performance issue.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



What does cat /sys/block/md0/md/mismatch_cnt say?

That fragmentation looks normal/fine.

Justin.

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Andrew Clayton wrote:

On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 12:43:24 -0400 (EDT), Justin Piszcz wrote:

Have you checked fragmentation?

You know, that never even occurred to me. I've gotten into the mind set
that it's generally not a problem under Linux.

xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/md3

What does this report?

# xfs_db -c frag -f /dev/md0
actual 1828276, ideal 1708782, fragmentation factor 6.54%

Good or bad?

Seeing as this filesystem will be three years old in December, that
doesn't seem overly bad.


I'm currently looking to things like

http://lwn.net/Articles/249450/ and
http://lwn.net/Articles/242559/

for potential help, fortunately it seems I won't have too long to wait.

Justin.

Cheers,

Andrew

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux