> I assume that you're prepared to repair all that damage to your tree, but > it seems a bit masochistic? It's either this or have an inconsistent coding style throughout raid5.c. I figure it is worth it to have reduced code duplication between raid5 and raid6, and it makes it easier to add new cache features going forward. I have a few more cleanups to add for a rev2 of this patch, but I will hold that off until the rebase is done.
In other words, it seemed like a good idea at the time, but I am open to suggestions. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
