Re: question about --assume-clean

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Saturday June 9, rabbit@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am about to create a large raid10 array, and I know for a fact that 
> all the components are identical (dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdXY). Is it 
> safe to pass --assume-clean and spare 6 hours of reconstruction, or are 
> there some hidden dangers in doing so?

No, there are no hidden dangers.

--assume-clean is generally quite safe with mirroring levels (raid1,
raid10).  The only issue is that if you do a regular 'check', then it
will reports lots of issues.  If do a 'repair' it will fix the issues.

With raid4/5/6, --assume-clean is *not* safe if there is any doubt that
the drive are not already in an in-sync state.

NeilBrown

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux