Re: RAID SB 1.x autodetection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 30 2007 16:35, Bill Davidsen wrote:
>> On 29 May 2007, Jan Engelhardt uttered the following:
>> > from your post at
>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg07384.html I
>> > read that autodetecting arrays with a 1.x superblock is currently
>> > impossible. Does it at least work to force the kernel to always assume
>> > a 1.x sb? There are some 'broken' distros out there that still don't
>> > use mdadm in initramfs, and recreating the initramfs each time is a
>> > bit cumbersome...
>> 
>> The kernel build system should be able to do that for you, shouldn't it?
>> 
> That would be an improvement, yes.

Hardly, with all the Fedora specific cruft. Anyway, there was a
simple patch posted in RH bugzilla, so I've gone with that.


	Jan
-- 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux