On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 12:33:49PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote: > Also, when I run simultaenous dd's from all of the drives, I see > 850-860MB/s, I am curious if there is some kind of limitation with > software raid as to why I am not getting better than 500MB/s for > sequential write speed? What does "vmstat 1" output look like in both cases? My guess is that for large writes it's NOT CPU bound but it can't hurt to check. > With 7 disks, I got about the same speed, adding 3 more for a total > of 10 did not seem to help in regards to write. However, read > improved to 622MBs/ from about 420-430MB/s. RAID is quirky. It's worth fiddling with the stripe size as that can have a big difference in terms of performance --- it's far from clear why on some setups some values work well and other setups you want very different values. It would be good to know if anyone has ever studied stripe size and also controller interleave/layout issues to get a good understanding of why certain values are good and others are very poor and why it varies so much from one setup to the other. Also, 'dd performance' varies between the start of a disk and the end. Typically you get better performance at the start of the disk so dd might not be a very good benchmark here. > However, if I want to upgrade to more than 12 disks, I am out of > PCI-e slots, so I was wondering, does anyone on this list run a 16 > port Areca or 3ware card and use it for JBOD? What kind of > performance do you see when using mdadm with such a card? Or if > anyone uses mdadm with less than a 16 port card, I'd like to hear > what kind of experiences you have seen with that type of > configuration. I've used some 2, 4 and 8 port 3ware cards. As JBODS they worked fine, as RAID cards I had no end of problems. I'm happy to test larger cards if someone wants to donate them :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
