Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday April 26, pryke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
have a system with 12 SATA disks attached via SAS. When copying into the
array during re-sync I get filesystem errors and corruption for raid6 but not
for raid5. This problem is repeatable. I actually have 2 separate 12 disk
arrays and get the same behavior on both.
Does this sound familiar to anyone?
Yes.
Here's a little more detail:
- 8 core AMD64 system running RHEL4U4 kernel 2.6.9-42.0.3.ELsmp
^^^^^
2.6.9 is very old. If you want support for RHEL, you should really be
asking RedHat.
Tell them it might be fixed by
http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/?PAGE=gnupatch&REV=1.1938.340.65
(I'm not sure how stable that URL is ... maybe take a copy now. it
should start
#### ChangeSet ####
2004-11-11 13:48:33-08:00, neilb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[PATCH] md: fix raid6 problem
Sometimes it didn't read all (working) drives before a parity calculation.
)
but I cannot be certain (it was a long time ago).
That patch came out after 2.6.9 but about 2 months.
So another option is to build a more recent kernel.
Generally if you run RHEL you don't build a newer kernel. Both because
there are often stability issues being addresses by using RHEL, and
because RH kernels are often patched in odd ways compared to mainline
and the system may expect subtly different behavior from the kernel.
For what RH charges, send them a copy of Neil's possible issue and let
them fix it.
Oh, and dropping a lot of data into a rebuilding array is generally not
desirable, often the total time will exceed rebuild and update as serial
operations. When it comes to write performance RAID6 is good for
reliability. ;-)
--
bill davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
CTO TMR Associates, Inc
Doing interesting things with small computers since 1979
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
