Re: parity check for read?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Mirko Benz wrote:
Neil,

Exactly what I had in mind.

Some vendors claim they do parity checking for reads. Technically it should be possible for Linux RAID as well but is not implemented – correct?

Reliability data for unrecoverable read errors:
- enterprise SAS drive (ST3300655SS): 1 in 10^16 bits transfered, ~ 1 error in 1,1 PB - enterprise SATA drive (ST3500630NS): 1 in 10^14 bits transfered, ~ 1 error in 11 TB

For a single SATA drive @ 50 MB/s it take on average 2,7 days to encounter an error. For a large RAID with several drives this becomes much lower or am I viewing this wrong?

Regards,
Mirko

One note is that if the drive itself notices the unrecoverable read error, MD will see this as an IO error and rebuild the stripe.

What you need the parity check on read for is to validate errors not at the disk sector level, but rather ones that sneak in from DRAM, HBA errors or wire level uncorrected errors.

ric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux