Re: [Linux-usb-users] Failed reads from RAID-0 array (from newbie who has read the FAQ)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Michael Schwarz wrote:

> Yeah; But here was where I lacked confidence. I used to know every inch of
> my kernel and my hardware, but, as previously stated, that was back in the
> 2.2.x days. I wasn't confident that I could run my hardware with a
> plain-vanilla kernel or that I could successfully roll my own working
> 2.6.x kernel in a timely manner. But, of course, I understand why this is
> a good idea.

It's not so hard to do, if you start from a known-good configuration.  
For instance, you could take the config your current distribution's kernel
is built from and just use it, although it would take a long time to build
because it includes so many drivers.  Whittling it down to just the
drivers you need would be tedious but not very difficult.

Alan Stern

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux