Re: RAID1, hot-swap and boot integrity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:32:32PM -0500, Mike Accetta wrote:

> Yes, we actually have a separate (smallish) boot partition at the front of
> the array.  This does reduce the at-risk window substantially.  I'll have to
> ponder whether it reduces it close enough to negligible to then ignore, but
> that is indeed a good point to consider.

Replacing a failed disk requires a human to pull out the old disk and
insert the new one. The /boot partition should resync in less than 1
minute (if not, it's _way_ too big), so the same human should still be
around to kick the machine if something goes wrong.

Gabor

-- 
     ---------------------------------------------------------
     MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
                Hungarian Academy of Sciences
     ---------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux