Re: end to end error recovery musings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Alan wrote:
I think that this is mostly true, but we also need to balance this against the need for higher levels to get a timely response. In a really large IO, a naive retry of a very large write could lead to a non-responsive system for a very large time...

And losing the I/O could result in a system that is non responsive until
the tape restore completes two days later....

Which brings us back to a recent discussion at the file system workshop on being more repair oriented in file system design so we can survive situations like this a bit more reliably ;-)

ric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux