On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 15:26:00 -0800 (PST) Luben Tuikov <ltuikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The reason was that my dev tree was tainted by this bug: > > if (good_bytes && > - scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, !!result) == NULL) > + scsi_end_request(cmd, 1, good_bytes, result == 0) == NULL) > return; > > in scsi_io_completion(). I had there !!result which is wrong, and when > I diffed against master, it produced a bad patch. Oh. I thought that got sorted out. It's a shame this wasn't made clear to me.. > As James mentioned one of the chunks is good and can go in. Please send a new patch, not referential to any previous patch or email, including full changelogging. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
