Re: New features?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 02:39:31PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:

> mdadm could probably be changed to be able to remove the device
> anyway.  The only difficulty is: how do you tell it which device to
> remove", given that there is no name in /dev to use.
> Suggestions?

Major:minor? If /sys/block still holds an entry for the removed disk,
then the user can figure it out from the name. Or mdadm could just
accept a path under /sys/block instead of a device node.

Gabor

-- 
     ---------------------------------------------------------
     MTA SZTAKI Computer and Automation Research Institute
                Hungarian Academy of Sciences
     ---------------------------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux