Re: why partition arrays?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 21 Oct 2006, Bodo Thiesen yowled:
> was hdb and what was hdd? And hde? Hmmm ...), so we decided the following 
> structure:
> 
> hda -> vg called raida -> creating LVs called raida1..raida4
> hdb -> vg called raidb -> creating LVs called raidb1..raidb4

I'm interested: why two VGs? Why not have one VG covering all RAID arrays,
and then another one for any unRAIDed space (if any)?

-- 
`When we are born we have plenty of Hydrogen but as we age our
 Hydrogen pool becomes depleted.'
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux