"Patrick Hoover" <phoover.eml@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Is anyone else having issues with USB interfaced disks to implement
> RAID? Any thoughts on Pros / Cons for doing this?
I have done, as a trial. USB disk support in recent 2.6 based
distributions was quite stable and reliable, and I had no significant
problems with RAID arrays -- including constructing arrays at boot time.
However, USB disk performance was not great; I wouldn't want to run more
than one, or possibly two, disks on a single USB controller. Anything
more than that and you really see performance drop off.
Also, the USB transaction latency seems a bit greater than IDE or SATA,
so there are longer delays in data getting in or out of the system --
which add up, and make workloads with lots of fsync and small files
painful.
For bulk storage of large data with low performance requirements
chaining a whole bunch of USB disks off a single controller would be
acceptable, but otherwise I wouldn't bother.
I didn't investigate IEEE-1394 connected disks, but I anticipate them to
have similar issues with controller latency and bandwidth. Tests with
two disks suggest a similar set of issues.[1]
Regards,
Daniel
Footnotes:
[1] Also, Linux optimizes the 1394 bus less well than it could,
so performance is hurt by that a bit.
--
Digital Infrastructure Solutions -- making IT simple, stable and secure
Phone: 0401 155 707 email: contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://digital-infrastructure.com.au/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
