Re: RAID6 fallen apart

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/3/06, Tuomas Leikola <tuomas.leikola@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Possibly safer to recreate with two missing if you aren't sure of the
> order.  That way you can look in the array to see if it looks right,
> or if you have to try a different order.

I'd say it's safer to recreate with all disks, in order to get the
resync. Otherwise you risk the all so famous silent data corruption on
stripes with writes in-flight at the time of failure.

Ment to say: after you know the correct order. Sorry.


Tuomas


--
VGER BF report: H 3.07213e-07
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux