Re: remark and RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Also sprach Molle Bestefich:"
> Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> > I would like raid request retries to be done with exponential
> > delays, so that we get a chance to overcome network brownouts.
> 
> Hmm, I don't think MD even does retries of requests.

I had a "robust read" patch in FR1, and I thought Neil extended that to
"robust write".  In robust read, we try to make up for a failed read
with info from elsewhere, and then we rewrite the inferred data onto the
failed device, in an attempt to fix a possible defect.  In robust write,
a failed write is retried.  But robust read is enough to cause a retry
(as a write).

> It does write-back as a (very successful! Thanks Neil :-D) attempt to
> fix bad blocks, but that's a different thing.

Apparently not different :).

> Is that what you meant?

Plozzziby.

> Or is there something sandwiched between MD and ENBD that performs retries...

Could be too. Dunno.

Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux