Neil Brown wrote:
Is 'bitmap' the best name for the sysfs file? It seems a bit generic to me. write-bits-here-to-dirty-them-in-the-bitmap is probably (no, definitely) too verbose. dirty-in-bitmap maybe? bitmap-set-bits
Any better suggestions?
I like "bitmap-set-bits" or "bitmap-dirty" maybe. I had thought about this, but never changed the name. I agree, something more than just "bitmap" is probably appropriate, so that if we ever add a generic bitmap output or input (to clear bits, maybe) then we still have "bitmap" available, and also because (as you said) "bitmap" is a little too generic for what this interface really does.
Thanks, Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
