On 20 Jul 2006, Neil Brown uttered the following: > On Tuesday July 18, david@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> I think there's a bug here somewhere. I wonder/suspect that the >> superblock should contain the fact that it's a partitioned/able md device? > > I've thought about that and am not in favour. > I would rather just assume everything is partitionable - put > CREATE auto=part As long as `partitionable' doesn't imply `partitioned': I'd quite like LVM-on-raw-md to keep working... -- `We're sysadmins. We deal with the inconceivable so often I can clearly see the need to define levels of inconceivability.' --- Rik Steenwinkel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
