Henrik Holst <henrik.holst <at> idgmail.se> writes: > Karl Voit wrote: > [snip] > > Well this is because of the false(?) superblocks of sda-sdd in comparison > to > > sda1 to sdd1. > > I don't understand this. Me neither *g* This is the hint of a friend of mine, who is lot more experienced with sw-raids. > Do you have more than a single partion on sda? No. > Is sda1 occupying the entire disk? Yes. root@ned ~ # fdisk -l /dev/sda Disk /dev/sda: 250.0 GB, 250059350016 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30401 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 30395 244147806 fd Linux raid autodetect root@ned ~ # I created the raid5 with sd[abcd]1 and not with sd[abcd]. > since the superblock is the /last/ > "128Kb" (I'm assuming 128*1024 bytes) the superblocks should be one and > the same. Really? Then how come that the md0 woun't start? I also upgraded my system (kernel and md0) and now I get longer messages about the superblocks which I already posted here in my previous posting. root@ned ~ # date;cat /proc/mdstat Mon Jul 10 10:56:44 CEST 2006 Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [multipath] [raid6] [raid10] unused devices: <none> root@ned ~ # TNX so far, I appreciate your help! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
