On Tue, Jul 04, 2006 at 12:46:03AM +0200, Luca Berra wrote:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:14:38AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
However....
+
+ /* if we are using udev and auto is not set, mdadm will almost
+ * certainly fail, so we force it here.
+ */
+ if (autof == 0 && access("/dev/.udevdb",F_OK) == 0)
+ autof=2;
+
I'm worried that this test is not very robust.
On my Debian/unstable system running used, there is no
/dev/.udevdb
though there is a
/dev/.udev/db
I guess I could test for both, but then udev might change
again.... I'd really like a more robust check.
is /dev/.udev/db a debianism?
no it is not
in this case a check for both might suffice, else i will have to think
harder about it.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@xxxxxxxxxx
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
