Re: read perfomance patchset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday June 19, raziebe@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Neil hello
> 
> if i am not mistaken here:
> 
> in first instance of :   if(bi) ...
>                ...
> 
> you return without setting to NULL
> 

Yes, you are right. Thanks.
And fixing that bug removes the crash.
However....

I've been doing a few tests and it is hard to measure much
improvement, which is strange.

I can maybe see a 1% improvement but that could just be noise.
I do some more and see if I can find out what is happening.

Interestingly, with a simple
  dd if=/dev/md1 of=/dev/null bs=1024k
test, 2.6.16 is substantially faster (10%) than 2.6.17-rc6-mm2 before 
that patches are added.  There is something weird there.

Have you done any testing?

NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux