Re: the question about raid0_make_request

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Neil Brown" <neilb@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: the question about raid0_make_request
From: "liu yang" <liudows2@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2006 21:36:10 +0800
Cc: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <17559.9185.778789.896340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4558af040606181821l17679796tf1c756de636ddb11@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17558.5.526854.354998@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4558af040606190029i72564bd5u735e5b4740bb2ad1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17558.28534.725605.257058@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4558af040606190814k2f76cfc8h38374eaed7fe6b19@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <17559.9185.778789.896340@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

I understand what you mean now.
Valid layerout is not always the 'right'  layerout.
Thanks for you help.

Regards.

YangLiu
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

References:
- the question about raid0_make_request
  - From: liu yang
- Re: the question about raid0_make_request
  - From: Neil Brown
- Re: the question about raid0_make_request
  - From: liu yang
- Re: the question about raid0_make_request
  - From: Neil Brown
- Re: the question about raid0_make_request
  - From: Neil Brown

Prev by Date: Re: IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction
Next by Date: Re: IBM xSeries stop responding during RAID1 reconstruction
Previous by thread: Re: the question about raid0_make_request
Next by thread: Is shrinking raid5 possible?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux RAID Wiki] [ATA RAID] [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure] [Linux Block] [Linux IDE] [Linux SCSI] [Linux Hams] [Device Mapper] [Device Mapper Cryptographics] [Kernel] [Linux Admin] [Linux Net] [GFS] [RPM] [git] [Yosemite Forum]

Powered by Linux