Neil Brown wrote:
On Monday June 19, nigel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
That seems to have fixed it. The reshape is now progressing and
there are no apparent errors in dmesg. Details below.
Great!
I'll send another confirmation tomorrow when hopefully it has finished :-)
Many thanks for a great product and great support.
And thank you for being a patient beta-tester!
NeilBrown
Neil - I see myself more as being an "idiot-proof" tester than a
beta-tester...
One comment - As I look at the rebuild, which is now over 20%, the time
till finish makes no sense. It did make sense when the first reshape
started. I guess your estimating / averaging algorithm doesn't work for
a restarted reshape. A minor cosmetic issue - see below
Nigel
[nterry@homepc ~]$ cat /proc/mdstat
Personalities : [raid5] [raid4]
md0 : active raid5 sdb1[1] sda1[0] hdc1[4](S) hdb1[2]
490223104 blocks super 0.91 level 5, 128k chunk, algorithm 2 [4/3]
[UUU_]
[====>................] reshape = 22.7% (55742816/245111552)
finish=5.8min speed=542211K/sec
unused devices: <none>
[nterry@homepc ~]$
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
