As data_disks is *less* than raid_disks, the current test here is
obviously wrong. And as the difference is already available in
conf->max_degraded, it makes much more sense to use that.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@xxxxxxx>
### Diffstat output
./drivers/md/raid5.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff ./drivers/md/raid5.c~current~ ./drivers/md/raid5.c
--- ./drivers/md/raid5.c~current~ 2006-06-01 15:03:29.000000000 +1000
+++ ./drivers/md/raid5.c 2006-06-01 15:05:28.000000000 +1000
@@ -2858,7 +2858,7 @@ static inline sector_t sync_request(mdde
* to resync, then assert that we are finished, because there is
* nothing we can do.
*/
- if (mddev->degraded >= (data_disks - raid_disks) &&
+ if (mddev->degraded >= conf->max_degraded &&
test_bit(MD_RECOVERY_SYNC, &mddev->recovery)) {
sector_t rv = (mddev->size << 1) - sector_nr;
*skipped = 1;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
