On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 11:06:21AM -0600, Craig Hollabaugh wrote:
On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 12:45 -0400, Mark Hahn wrote:
I think the current situation is good, since there is some danger of
going too far. for instance, testing each partition to see whether
it contains a valid superblock would be pretty crazy, right? requiring
either the "auto-assemble-me" partition type, or explicit partitions
given in a config file is a happy medium...
I created my array in 1/2003, don't know versions of kernel or mdadm I
was using then.
In my situation over the past few days.
kernel 2.4.30 kicked non-fresh
kernel 2.6.11.8 kicked non-fresh
kernel 2.6.18.8 didn't mention anything, just skipped my 'linux'
partitions
These kernels auto-assemble prior to mounting /. So the kernel doesn't
consult my
/etc/mdadm/mdadm.conf file. Is this correct?
i strongly believe it is not correct to let kernel auto-assemble devices
kernel auto-assembly should be disable and activation should be handled
by mdadm only!
L.
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@xxxxxxxxxx
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
