Am Sonntag, 14. Mai 2006 20:42 schrieben Sie: > > Now the devices have all two superblocks, the one left from the first try > > which are now kinda orphaned and those now active. > > Can I trust mdadm to handle this properly on its own? > > I'm not sure what "properly" means. you should not leave around 0xfd Well, properly means properly. As opposite of "f!ck up". Here: chose the superblocks from the partitions instead of from the entire hdd. There is everything fine with those fs partitions and the array, but there seems some old superblocks lying to be around behind those partitions. > or zero the superblock or both... More questions: is the raid superblock the same as an "ordinary" file system superblock? "Zero" the superblock - the orphaned one, I assume? This is not like "zero it and linux makes a new one" or so? Dex -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GCS d--(+)@ s-:+ a- C+++(++++) UL+>++++ P+>++ L+++>++++ E-- W++ N o? K- w--(---) !O M+ V- PS++(+) PE(-) Y++ PGP t++(---)@ 5 X+(++) R+(++) tv--(+)@ b++(+++) DI+++ D G++ e* h>++ r%>* y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ http://www.stop1984.com http://www.againsttcpa.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
