Re: raid5 resizing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil Brown wrote:
> On Monday May 1, cat@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
>>Hey folks.
>>
>>There's no point in using LVM on a raid5 setup if all you intend to do
>>in the future is resize the filesystem on it, is there? The new raid5
>>resizing code takes care of providing the extra space and then as long
>>as the say ext3 filesystem is created with resize_inode all should be
>>sweet. Right? Or have I missed something crucial here? :)
> 
> 
> You are correct.  md/raid5 makes the extra space available all by
> itself. 

Further - even if you don't create the filesystem with the right amount
of extra metadata space for online resizing, you can resize any ext2/3
filesystem offline, and it doesn't take very long. You just use
resize2fsf instead of ext2online

-Mike
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux