Re: data recovery on raid5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan wrote:
> how safe should the following be?
>
> mdadm --assemble /dev/md0 --uuid=8fe1fe85:eeb90460:c525faab:cdaab792
> /dev/etherd/e0.[01234]

You can hardly do --assemble anymore.
After you have recreated superblocks on some of the devices, those are
conceptually part of a different raid array.  At least as seen by MD.

> I am *really* not interested in making my situation worse.

We'll keep going till you got your data back..
Recreating superblocks again on e0.{0,2,3} can't hurt, since you've
already done this and thereby nuked the old superblocks.

You can shake your own hand and thank yourself now (oh, and Sam too)
for posting all the debug output you have.  Otherwise we would
probably never have spotted nor known about the parity/chunk size
differences :o).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux