Re: replace disk in raid5 without linux noticing?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2006-04-19 at 18:31 +0200, Shai wrote:
> On 4/19/06, Dexter Filmore <Dexter.Filmore@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Let's say a disk in an array starts yielding smart errors but is still
> > functional.
> > So instead of waiting for it to fail completely and start a sync and stress
> > the other disks, could I clone that disk to a fresh one, put the array
> > offline and replace the disk?
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Why can't you just mark that drive as failed, remove it and hotadd a
> new drive to replace the failed drive?

because background rebuild is slower than disk to disk copy, since his
disk is still fully functional.


> 
> Shai
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux