Re: No syncing after crash. Is this a software raid bug?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/03/06 11.47, Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 02:16:11PM +0100, Kasper Dupont wrote:
> > > If it relies on static page content during updates of its mirrors, it
> > > need to take a private copy of the page(s).
> > 
> > And by that you mean that raid5 and raid6 must copy the page
> > contents before writing it to disk?
> 
> Yes.
> They need to do it anayway in order to calculate parity blocks.

OK, I'll do some testing with raid5 then. I want to know if it
behaves differently from raid1 in this respect.

-- 
Kasper Dupont -- Rigtige mænd skriver deres egne backupprogrammer
#define _(_)"d.%.4s%."_"2s" /* This is my new email address */
char*_="@2kaspner"_()"%03"_("4s%.")"t\n";printf(_+11,_+6,_,6,_+2,_+7,_+6);
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux