RE: raid5 performance question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Does test 1 have 4 processes?
Does test 2 have 1 process?

The number of testing processes should be the same in both tests.

} -----Original Message-----
} From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-raid-
} owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Raz Ben-Jehuda(caro)
} Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 6:46 AM
} To: Linux RAID Mailing List
} Cc: Neil Brown
} Subject: raid5 performance question
} 
} Neil Hello .
} I have a performance question.
} 
} I am using raid5 stripe size 1024K over 4 disks.
} I am benchmarking it with an asynchronous tester.
} This tester submits 100 IOs of size of 1024 K --> as the stripe size.
} It reads raw io from the device, no file system is involved.
} 
} I am making the following comparsion:
} 
} 1. Reading 4 disks at the same time using 1 MB buffer in random manner.
} 2. Reading 1 raid5 device using 1MB buffer in random manner.
} 
} I am getting terrible results in scenario 2. if scenario 1 gives 120 MB/s
} from
} 4 disks, the raid5 device gives 35 MB/s .
} it is like i am reading a single disk , but by looking at iostat i can
} see that all
} disks are active but with low throughput.
} 
} Any idea ?
} 
} Thank you.
} --
} Raz
} -
} To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
} the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
} More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux