Er,,, no :) This was on another machine, luckily, I am not that stupid. I was using /dev/hdb in that one, sorry to be a bit unclear about that. Also, I usually sit on my hands for a sec when I do such powerfull commands. Good, so I make some chances then with dd_rescue, I'll let you know then, I have to try this tonight. Krekna 2006/2/15, Burkhard Carstens <suse-ml@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Am Dienstag, 14. Februar 2006 11:35 schrieb Krekna Mektek: > [...] > > Actually, /dev/hdd1 partition is 390708801 blocks, the disk itself is > > a Hitachi 400GB disk. > > So this is 390708801 blocks of 1024 bytes. This is according to my > > calculation 400085812224 bytes. > > The Faulty-RAIDDisk.img is according to my ls -l 400085771264 bytes. > > > > So it looks like they are quite the same, and the difference between > > the two is 40960 bytes. These are 40 blocks, so 36 are missing? > > > > The dd actually succeeded, and did finish the job in about one day. > > The badblocks were found after about the first 7 Gigs. > > > > Is there no way like the conv=noerror for mdadm, to just continue? > > Can I restore the superblock on the .img file somehow? > > Is it probably save to --zero-superblock all the three disks and that > > the RAID array will create two new superblocks (Leaving the spare > > out, because its probably out of date). > > > > I can do the dd again, but I think it will do the same thing, because > > it finished 'succesfully'. > > The superblock is at the end of the disk I read, about the last > > 64-128K or something. > > My experience is that dd conv=noerror doesn't do the job correctly!! It > still won't write a block that it cannot read. > Please use "dd_rescue -A /dev/hdd1 /mnt/hdb1/Faulty-RAIDDisk.img" > instead. See "dd_rescue --help". > > > ADEVICE /dev/hdb1 /dev/hdc1 /dev/loop0 > > ARRAY /dev/md0 devices=/dev/hdb1,/dev/hdc1,/dev/loop0 > > another thing: /mnt/hdb1/ is not the same hdb1, you are using in the > raid5, is it? > > It might be a bad idea to mount /dev/hdb1, write to it, > and afterwards assemble the array with hdb1 being part of it ... Extra > bad, if loop0 points to a file on hdb1 ?? However, if you did dd to a > file on the partition, that should be part of the degraded raid5 array, > I guess your data is already gone ... > > Good luck > Burkhard > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
