Don't forget, that speed is per disk! :) In about 10 years we will laugh at how slow this is. } -----Original Message----- } From: linux-raid-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-raid- } owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Hardy } Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 4:56 PM } To: linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx } Subject: Re: ludicrous speed: raid6 reconstruction } } } I saw this on my array, and other(s) have reported it as well. } } Apparently the reconstruction speed algorithm doesn't understand that } it's not syncing all the blocks and hilarity ensues. I believe that was } it, anyway } } Either that or you really have a hell of a server :-) } } -Mike } } jurriaan wrote: } > Personalities : [linear] [raid0] [raid1] [raid5] [raid4] [raid6] } > md0 : active raid6 sdh1[7] sdg1[6] sdf1[5] sde1[4] sdd1[3] sdc1[2] } sdb1[1] sda1[0] } > 1465175424 blocks level 6, 64k chunk, algorithm 2 [8/8] [UUUUUUUU] } > [==================>..] resync = 91.0% (222239104/244195904) } finish=0.0min speed=7369041K/sec } > bitmap: 23/233 pages [92KB], 512KB chunk } > I am reminded of Spaceball's 'ludicrous speed' here. This is after a } > reboot from 2.6.16-rc1-mm3 (where the array was built) to 2.6.16-rc1-mm5 } > (where rebuilding continued thanks to the bitmap). } - } To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in } the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx } More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
