Re: RAID 16?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote:

>> Hmm. You'd have eight disks, five(!) may fail at any time, giving you
> 
> Four, isn't it?
> RAID6 covers the failure of 2 of the underlying RAID1s, which, in turn,
> means failures of 2 disks each, so four. Sometimes even 5, yes - given the
> right ones fail.

No -- with any four failed disks you still do not have a single point of
failure. Only when you take out two RAID1 pairs and one disk in a third
pair does the second disk in that third pair become a SPOF.

-- 
Matthias Urlichs   |   {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de   |  smurf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
 - -
Man created God in his own image.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux RAID Wiki]     [ATA RAID]     [Linux SCSI Target Infrastructure]     [Linux Block]     [Linux IDE]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux Hams]     [Device Mapper]     [Device Mapper Cryptographics]     [Kernel]     [Linux Admin]     [Linux Net]     [GFS]     [RPM]     [git]     [Yosemite Forum]


  Powered by Linux