On Thursday February 2, linux-raid@xxxxxxx wrote: > > In any case, I have included the relevant dmesgs and a --examine and > --detail for all drives as soon as the second (2.6.15.1) weird rebuild > started. If you need any more info I'll do my best to provide it, but I > thought I should at least report this. Thanks for all the details. I can see what is happening. sdj1 (the failed drive) is claiming the same slot in the array as sdo1 (the spare drive that has been rebuilt), so sdo1 gets rejected. sdj1 should be rejected before that because of the old 'event' count, but the 'autorun' code isn't doing that check. I'll see what I can do about fixing this. Thanks again, NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
