On 2006-01-23T10:44:18, Heinz Mauelshagen <mauelshagen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Besides, stacking between dm devices so far (ie, if I look how kpartx
> > does it, or LVM2 on top of MPIO etc, which works just fine) is via the
> > block device layer anyway - and nothing stops you from putting md on top
> > of LVM2 LVs either.
> >
> > I use the regularly to play with md and other stuff...
>
> Me too but for production, I want to avoid the
> additional stacking overhead and complexity.
Ok, I still didn't get that. I must be slow.
Did you implement some DM-internal stacking now to avoid the above
mentioned complexity?
Otherwise, even DM-on-DM is still stacked via the block device
abstraction...
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
